![]() |
| Who can blame this face? |
“In your typical
relationship there is often an amount of “acting out” by one party or the other.
However, our investigation has shown that if the female is of “cute” appearance
– as defined by a randomised group in a laboratory setting – we find
unwillingness and/or inability by the male to see her misdeeds as significantly
reprehensible.”
In such a
relationship, activity such as "repeated cheating" will be seen as stemming
from “weakness”; whereas in another relationship it is more likely to be
described as “downright fucking selfish.”
Professor Dean
went on to add, “Of course both descriptions are biased. Moral weakness and
selfishness are really one and the same. The separation is merely semantic.”
Subsequent testing pointed to the “cuteness:mitigation effect” existing not merely within
the confines of the two person relationship, but spilling over into the
perceptions of mutual associates. “We were curious as to whether or not greater
detachment from the incidents provided a less biased view. We concluded maybe a
bit, but not really.
"Perhaps it’s something to do with the prism effect of those glasses they always wear. We’ll have to look into that.”
"Perhaps it’s something to do with the prism effect of those glasses they always wear. We’ll have to look into that.”

No comments:
Post a Comment